Questions about what belongs on the walls of Britain's national institutions tend to simmer quietly until they don't.
Helen Cammock has withdrawn her video installation Persistence from the National Portrait Gallery following intense debate over its depiction of Winston Churchill's role in the 1943 Bengal famine. The work, commissioned as part of the gallery's Artists First programme, had been on display since September 2025 and was due to remain until August 2026.
The 40-minute video referred to "the wilful starvation of the Indian population by Winston Churchill" during the famine, while comparing his conduct with Oliver Cromwell's campaigns in Ireland. The catastrophe claimed an estimated three million lives in British-ruled India and remains the subject of ongoing historical debate.
Criticism escalated after historian and former gallery trustee Andrew Roberts wrote to "protest in the strongest possible terms." Roberts, a Churchill biographer, dismissed the installation as an "ideologically motivated rant." His letter was countersigned by more than 50 members of the House of Lords, including Churchill's grandson Nicholas Soames and former gallery trustee Michael Hintze.
Both Cammock and the gallery initially defended the work, with the institution stating that the commission was presented as an artistic piece rather than a documentary. This week, however, the gallery confirmed Persistence had been removed at the artist's request.
Born in Staffordshire in 1970, Cammock came to art after a decade working as a social worker. Her practice spans moving image, photography, poetry, spoken word, song, printmaking and installation. She was jointly awarded the 2019 Turner Prize alongside Tai Shani, Oscar Murillo and Lawrence Abu Hamdan after the four nominees asked the jury to share the honour. Her Turner entry, The Long Note, examined women's roles in Derry's civil rights movement. In 2023, she received a Paul Hamlyn Foundation Award for Artists.
In a statement, Cammock said: "There is an incredible pressure on artists and arts institutions to bend to external pressure; to be benign at best and silent at worst." She added: "I do not accept this pressure. To question, challenge and explore ideas and histories is vital to a healthy society, and art is intrinsic to this."
The Artists First: Contemporary Perspectives on Portraiture programme, supported by the CHANEL Culture Fund, invited eight contemporary artists to create new works reclaiming untold narratives alongside the gallery's historic collection. Portraiture, understood as a conduit for the affirmation of power and presence, sat at the heart of Cammock's layered approach. That framework now has a conspicuous gap.
The gallery said it recognised "the legacy of those portrayed on our walls, just as we respect artistic expression." Holding both positions at once, as several commentators have noted, is considerably harder than stating them. Whether the withdrawal sets a precedent for how publicly funded institutions handle contested historical narratives in commissioned art is a question that will outlast the news cycle. For now, the screen is dark.
Check topics and authors from this story to see more stories like this in your personalized feed and receive updates when new work is published.
